Re: PC Subjectless: The Cycle Must Continue

 Pages PREV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 . . . 1048 NEXT
 

I really want 150x150 avys now. Maybe a little larger space for the messages themselves and less clutter on the top of the screen. I need to scroll to see posts when on top of the page. With the GT Noir -theme and Adblock+ the old forums started almost from the top of the screen. It was very user-friendly.

Brunoc:

YOU said Portugal were probably the worthy winners

Did you choose to ignore the rest of the statement? SPAIN HAD THE BETTER CLEAR CUT CHANCES, this proves they deserved to win. Football is about scoring as we all know so clearly the team that scores/is closest to scoring is the more deserving out of the two

And lol if you think Barca are divers, i'm not even gonna bother, it's clear you'll be the equivalent of a brick wall to argue with.

So, Portugal probably worthy winners = Portugal were completely dominant?

Football is played over 90 minutes, the team closest to scoring most of the times does not equal the team that played better over 90 minutes. Spain was not clearly the better team over those 90 minutes, even if they had more chances.

Diving is just one of the few things that makes UEFAlona the most disgusting club in the history of football. Which made the revenge oh so much sweeter. KTBFFH.

Atwa:

Brunoc:

YOU said Portugal were probably the worthy winners

Did you choose to ignore the rest of the statement? SPAIN HAD THE BETTER CLEAR CUT CHANCES, this proves they deserved to win. Football is about scoring as we all know so clearly the team that scores/is closest to scoring is the more deserving out of the two

And lol if you think Barca are divers, i'm not even gonna bother, it's clear you'll be the equivalent of a brick wall to argue with.

So, Portugal probably worthy winners = Portugal were completely dominant.

Football is played over 90 minutes, the team closest to scoring most of the times does not equal the team that played better over 90 minutes. Spain was nowhere near the better team over those 90 minutes, even if they had more chances.

Diving is just one of the few things that makes UEFAlona the most disgusting club in the history of football. Which made the revenge oh so much sweeter. KTBFFH.

What's wrong with you? Who played better is irrelevant were discussing your original statement that said Portugal were worthy winners, how can you be a winner without creating chances?? Please respond. Playing nice football with no goals wins you nothing

Were not discussing who played better, were discussing who deserved to win and that is based on the chances you had

By your logic, Chelsea didn't deserve to win the Champions League because against Barca they weren't playing expansive attacking football and flooding Barca's goal with attacks, when in reality Chelsea simply took the chances they got whilst Barca squandered theirs making Chelsea the deserved winners.

And UEFAlona? Keep believing that.

Brunoc:

What's wrong with you? Who played better is irrelevant were discussing your original statement that said Portugal were worthy winners, how can you be a winner without creating chances?? Please respond. Playing nice football with no goals wins you nothing

Were not discussing who played better, were discussing who deserved to win and that is based on the chances you had

By your logic, Chelsea didn't deserve to win the Champions League because against Barca they weren't playing expansive attacking football and flooding Barca's goal with attacks, when in reality Chelsea simply took the chances they got whilst Barca squandered theirs making Chelsea the deserved winners.

And UEFAlona? Keep believing that.

See, now you're wrong. We ARE discussing who played better. For some reason you believe that the most worthy winner is the team that had the most chances. I believe the worthy winner is the team who played better. If Spain had created 10-20 more clear cut chances you would perhaps have been right. They did however create chances that are countable on one hand, thus the difference on who was worthy cannot be counted on chances alone. Portugal played better for enough parts of the game that I consider them worthy winners.

No, that is IF your logic was correct. Chelsea had close to no chances against Barcelona. Therefor if your logic was right Barcelona would be worthy winners, since they had more chances. When in reality we outplayed Barca tactically, therefor being clear winners without anywhere close to as many chances.

Come at me in PM if you wish to talk further, no point in spamming this thread.

New site looks clean. So far the only thing I would change would be an added color difference between a user's avatar area and post.

I would change so much if I could...oh so much.

Atwa:

Brunoc:

What's wrong with you? Who played better is irrelevant were discussing your original statement that said Portugal were worthy winners, how can you be a winner without creating chances?? Please respond. Playing nice football with no goals wins you nothing

Were not discussing who played better, were discussing who deserved to win and that is based on the chances you had

By your logic, Chelsea didn't deserve to win the Champions League because against Barca they weren't playing expansive attacking football and flooding Barca's goal with attacks, when in reality Chelsea simply took the chances they got whilst Barca squandered theirs making Chelsea the deserved winners.

And UEFAlona? Keep believing that.

See, now you're wrong. We ARE discussing who played better. For some reason you believe that the most worthy winner is the team that had the most chances. I believe the worthy winner is the team who played better. If Spain had created 10-20 more clear cut chances you would perhaps have been right. They did however create chances that are countable on one hand, thus the difference on who was worthy cannot be counted on chances alone. Portugal played better for enough parts of the game that I consider them worthy winners.

No, that is IF your logic was correct. Chelsea had close to no chances against Barcelona. Therefor if your logic was right Barcelona would be worthy winners, since they had more chances. When in reality we outplayed Barca tactically, therefor being clear winners without anywhere close to as many chances.

Come at me in PM if you wish to talk further, no point in spamming this thread.

Nah nah nah, read what i said before, the team that scores/makes more chances. That means if its a draw for example the team that had the most clearcut chances but in the Barca Chelsea game Chelsea scored their chances so they deserved to win

But yeah i can't be bothered to argue anymore, as you say it's spamming the thread abit

Anyway guys is the Steam Sale confirmed for tomorrow?

God dam it Valve, when will you learn to count to 3?

http://www.teamfortress.com/pyromania/

Look at this Day 1, Day 2, but no Day 3 and Day 3 is almost over for us EUS.

Iv bee waitng all night for this god dam update some people have to go bed you know. FFS

Half-Life 3 will never come out since Valve cant count to 3, as proffen by this.

Holy shit I stay logged in after I close Chrome. That is by far the biggest improvement.

GT language options don't leave much choice


only to

I've always wondered if those options even do anything on websites...

I miss the old GT already. I can't even find the bloody log-in link. I have to try and make a post so it prompts me to log-in.

Malinthebeast:
I miss the old GT already. I can't even find the bloody log-in link. I have to try and make a post so it prompts me to log-in.

The "stalker-bar" at the bottom, there should be an option to log in. And this time it remembers your log in info too so you don't need to manually do it every single time you restart your browser or use another device to browse.

You people are far too negative when it comes to the new site.

Texhnolyzed:
You people are far too negative when it comes to the new site.

You trying to be positive?

jkjk

I'm more happy about this site after NiGHTS' theme. And I'm glad to see all the errors(well most of them) and glitches go.

Texhnolyzed:
You people are far too negative when it comes to the new site.

It seems like all people do on GT is bitch and moan.

Either way the new site will take some time to get used to, but there are bound to be some issues that should be changed.

Is arya gone?I will begin to love the new forums if he is gone.

Is there any way to change the theme of the new site? I really don't like the colors.

Thanoswf:
Is arya gone?I will begin to love the new forums if he is gone.

XiDiO is arya no?

Wow... it didn't even carry over my post count or join date? WTF!?

Atwa:

Thanoswf:
Is arya gone?I will begin to love the new forums if he is gone.

XiDiO is arya no?

Oh crap,i forgot.

Hey Gattz, welcome to GT

Hmm... My original account has been unbanned?

EDIT: Well, I guess I'll just keep using my old account, lol.

Anyone else have to create a new username to be able to post with their old account?

XiDiO:

Thanoswf:
Is arya gone?I will begin to love the new forums if he is gone.

Well, it is simple: Dont reply to my posts.

Secondly, you kept calling me names, and didnt really stop with it either.
( I dont know why no mods have done anything yet )

Calling you names?
The one and only time i called you "something" a mod pm'ed me with a warning told him that it was not intended and everything is fine.
Trust me,i got nothing personal with you as a person(I really don't know you.)

But I have a problem with your attitude and the negativity you are outputting into these forums,chill out a bit.
I don't thing i'm the only one and if you are not just trolling with some of your posts consider that as advice.

XiDiO:

Thanoswf:
Calling you names?
The one and only time i called you "something" a mod pm'ed me with a warning told him that it was not intended and everything is fine.

Calling me pedophile approx 3 times is not intended? Ok!

3 Times??
What the hell?
I only told that one time and it started as joke from other forum members.
I got a warning and talked with a mod for that issue.

But 3 times?Seriously?I want you to find these 3 quotes.

XiDiO:

Thanoswf:
3 Times??
What the hell?
I only told that one time and it started as joke from other forum members.
I got a warning and talked with a mod for that issue.

But 3 times?Seriously?I want you to find these 3 quotes.

Im not gonna search on this cluttered forum.
Secondly, yes, approx 3 times. The last time, You jumped on the boat together with sorwis, where zorlac gave an official warning in that particular thread.

And how the hell is it not intended when you clearly write it down?

I wrote it down as a joke,i didn't really knew that you had a problem with it.Half the forum was calling you that,i thought it was a common joke.And in that particular thread it was the one and only time i called you that.

Well since now i know that this hurts you i have to apologize for that.You really should not have a problem with these things on the internet though,i'm used to seeing people calling one another names in forums just for fun,that's the internet i know,we are not in a school or something.

Take care and try to improve your identity into these forums,it will do good to you and everyone and noone will gonna call you names again.

The only problem i have with you is that your negativity(Intended or unintended) is destroying threads,that's all.Nothing personal.

If you don't like someone, ignore him, if that's too hard for you try adding him to the foes/ignore list.

XiDiO:

Thanoswf:
I wrote it down as a joke,i didn't really knew that you had a problem with it.Half the forum was calling you that,i thought it was a common joke.And in that particular thread it was the one and only time i called you that.

The only problem i have with you is that your negativity(Intended or unintended) is destroying threads,that's all.Nothing personal.

Uhh.. Read the GT rules please.

MY negativity? Because not hyping everything like some people means Im a bad negative person..

You don't have to hype anything,you can just be more neutral,i can understand negativity in some sittuations but not anywhere.Your negativity looks like intented to my eyes.I may be wrong though,anyway.

That's a completely personal discussion here and this is a public thread,if you want to sort this thing out and finally end it throw me a pm.

Demonicturtle66:

Texhnolyzed:
You people are far too negative when it comes to the new site.

It seems like all people do on GT is bitch and moan.

Sounds like classic GT since 2007

I think my complaint about the videos is pretty legit, considering this site is called GAMETRAILERS and the videos are BELOW SD quality for me. Just saying

PT-Desu:
If you don't like someone, ignore him, if that's too hard for you try adding him to the foes/ignore list.

I'll never put someone into an internet ignore list.I'll just tell him what i don't like about him,the same thing others done to me and i got better since in many aspects they were right.I believe we are a community here.Or are we not?

Thanoswf:

PT-Desu:
If you don't like someone, ignore him, if that's too hard for you try adding him to the foes/ignore list.

I'll never put someone into an internet ignore list.I'll just tell him what i don't like about him,the same thing others done to me and i got better since in many aspects they were right.I believe we are a community here.Or are we not?

We are, but when someone goes and attacks users for their opinions or just for the heck of it sometimes adding them to an ignore list is the best thing to do.

Yeah, looks like total phpbb crap right now. And they went with gray

 Pages PREV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 . . . 1048 NEXT

Reply to Thread

Log in or Register to Comment
Have an account? Login below:
With Facebook: Login With Facebook
or
Username:  
Password:  
  
Not registered? To sign up for an account with GameTrailers:
Register With Facebook
Register With Facebook
or
Register for a free account here