It's a quite common facet of contemporary politics: make an outrageously racist claim, and as soon as people chastise you for it, turn it around and claim reverse racism as the culprit of the detractions against your comment. And I'm honestly not sure which is worse: the fact that people do this, or the fact that their supporters encourage it, inspiring them to follow suit. How are we expected to overcome racism when there are those who work so diligently to keep it alive?
There are those amongst us who will have you believe that racism is dead. That racism was wiped out by the 1980's, and all that's left is the residual "reverse racism," the bi-product of minorities guilt-tripping Caucasians in an effort to keep them on edge. This methodology is being deployed with a "paint their ideology into a corner" mentality; say something racist, but when someone chastises you for your hateful remarks, simply claim it all as a case of reverse-racism to escape penalty. Suddenly, you're the victim of a hate crime, and the people angry at you for committing an act of racism are the real bullies in the equation. It looks good to these people on paper, and for those with a platform for their remarks, it has the effect of firing up their fan-base and inspiring them to use the same rules of thought. Suddenly, the only form of racism that exists in the United States is, according to them, of the reverse variety.
What makes this tale a truly tragic one is that these people have encapsulated themselves in a bubble of hate. The rest of the world thinks they're racists, but they think that the rest of the world is the real racist in the equation. Take Rush Limbaugh for instance. Rush Limbaugh is a blatantly ignorant racist of the most vocal variety in modern media. If photographs emerged of Limbaugh setting fire to crosses, most of the American public wouldn't be surprised. But his fans? They'd defend Limbaugh through thick and thin, with claims that the pictures are fraudulent, or that the President is somehow to blame. The number one thing you'd hear from his base? It's reverse racism. "What happened to freedom of speech?" they'd say. "Why can't a guy burn crosses without everyone assuming he's a racist?" Limbaugh has made some of the most racist comments recorded in the popular media since the Civil Rights movement. But his fans seem to either not realize the problem at hand, or simply not care. I have a hard time believing that most of his fans are oblivious to Limbaugh's racism, though. I think many of his fans recognize that his remarks are racist, but choose to not get upset about it. I realize that this is a pretty broad generalisation, but how anyone is expected to believe that millions of people are completely unaware of racism when it's right in front of their eyes is well beyond me.
The media aside, what really concerns me about the "reverse racism card" is the political ramifications of this highly-specialised brand of stupidity. This mode of thought allows people to get away with some pretty outrageous stuff in the political arena. Claiming that anyone and everyone who is opposed to Arizona's draconian immigration law is fully supporting illegal immigration is a pretty decent example. One could very easily point toward countless instances where racism has been directly aimed at President Obama, but then protected under the ideological shield of claiming reverse racism. Or take a look at Rand Paul's comments regarding segregation, where he stated his belief that restaurants should be allowed to refuse service to whomever they like. Merely asking if their may have been a racist motive involved sparked immediate hostility from the Tea Party, which Paul belongs to, with claims of reverse racism from some of his street-level supporters.
Does reverse racism exist? Yes, it does. No one could really say it doesn't, not honestly anyway. Does it happen to the extent that some might have you believe? Not even remotely. In the majority of instances where I've personally heard the phrase "reverse racism" in use, it stemmed from a racist incident in and of itself. Genuine racism still happens every single day in the United States, and elsewhere, for that matter. Making claims of reverse racism where none really exists does little else than minimize the ill effects that true racism presents to our society as a whole. It's a subject that's drenched in a stigma that few seem to really grasp, largely due to their never having experienced it first-hand. If we hope to ever rid ourselves of the social disease that is racism, combating improper uses of the phrase "reverse racism" would be a tremendous step in the right direction.