Visit cartooncat's column >>

CARTOONCAT

Articles Posted: 31; Links Seeded: 6936
Member Since: 2/2007Last Seen: 11/24/2009

'Sex at 13' call on BBC

Article Source: The Sun Newspaper Online
advertisement

THE BBC caused outrage last night after it allowed a leading academic to demand the age of consent be lowered to 13.

Professor John Spencer, appearing on a BBC Radio Four programme to be broadcast tomorrow night, says ALL teenagers should be free to have sex.

And he argues the current age of consent of 16 has turned half the population into criminals who broke the law as youngsters.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
11
3.9
{"commentId":9638628,"authorDomain":"elprezidente"}

Not like there isn't enough teenage sexual related problems out there...maybe we should just give everybody herpes so that isn't a problem anymore either.

{"commentId":9638628,"threadId":"682873","contentId":"3300354","authorDomain":"elprezidente"}
  • 1 vote
#1 - Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:45 AM EDT
{"commentId":9638821,"authorDomain":"sgreenway"}

Merely passing a law isn't going to stop teens from having sex. Seriously, it's a stupid ass idea. Education is the only answer.

{"commentId":9638821,"threadId":"682873","contentId":"3300354","authorDomain":"sgreenway"}
  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:53 AM EDT
{"commentId":9639919,"authorDomain":"RNMOM"}

Is he crazy? As an ER nurse I see 12 yrs come in with STD's because they had sex with the wrong person. It is horrifying. Making 13 the age of consent will do nothing but hurt the teen and may very well increase the pregnancy rate of teens.

Not to mention that young teens are very easily manipulized and I can see someonetaking advantage of their inexperience. I agree with education but also communication between the parents and the teens is essential.

{"commentId":9639919,"threadId":"682873","contentId":"3300354","authorDomain":"RNMOM"}
  • 1 vote
#2 - Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:39 AM EDT
{"commentId":9640842,"authorDomain":"sgreenway"}

So, what good does age of consent do anyways? Do you think if it were changed to 18, that teens would just stop having sex? The whole point is that age of consent laws are ridiculous and do nothing to curb the problem.

{"commentId":9640842,"threadId":"682873","contentId":"3300354","authorDomain":"sgreenway"}
  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:17 PM EDT
{"commentId":9641044,"authorDomain":"zomzom"}

And putting the speed limit at 65 isn't gonna stop me from driving 75 on the freeway. So what? The purpose of the law is to allow judges and police to have the discretion to arrest and prosecute when it is an issue. Lower it to 13 and you'll have perverts seducing little kids. Keep it at 16 and you'll occasionally have a judge that hasta dismiss an idiotic case of a high school sophomore sleeping with his freshmen girlfriend.

{"commentId":9641044,"threadId":"682873","contentId":"3300354","authorDomain":"zomzom"}
  • 4 votes
#3 - Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:26 PM EDT
{"commentId":9641983,"authorDomain":"sgreenway"}
he purpose of the law is to allow judges and police to have the discretion to arrest and prosecute when it is an issue. Lower it to 13 and you'll have perverts seducing little kids.

Agreed. It's my view that age of consent should apply only to minor + non minor sex, when there is a discernable age gap.

{"commentId":9641983,"threadId":"682873","contentId":"3300354","authorDomain":"sgreenway"}
  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:06 PM EDT
{"commentId":9642259,"authorDomain":"kperodin"}

BAjunkie

I never explicitly thought of an age gap formula that would shape a more comprehensive sex offense law. Yet a leeway based on age gap - 2 years for instance - makes all kinds of sense: I can hardly justify calling an 18 year old having sex with a 16 year old a public menace, and cataloging him or her as a registered sex offender.

{"commentId":9642259,"threadId":"682873","contentId":"3300354","authorDomain":"kperodin"}
  • 5 votes
#3.2 - Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:19 PM EDT
{"commentId":9643207,"authorDomain":"sgreenway"}

Yeah.. that was my reasoning. I seem to remember a state or two that actually has some provision currently like this.. but can't remember which one or what the provision specifically states.

{"commentId":9643207,"threadId":"682873","contentId":"3300354","authorDomain":"sgreenway"}
  • 3 votes
#3.3 - Tue Sep 22, 2009 2:00 PM EDT
{"commentId":9641825,"authorDomain":"rachel-191090"}

The age of consent is fine at 16, doesn't mean teenagers are going to stick to it, but personally I think it should be up to the teenagers themselves when they are ready. The age of consent is more there to protect kids from paedophiles, if two 15 year olds have sex together and they both are ready then I don't see what the problem is, but I think the age of consent should remain at 16, lower it any and you open the door to older perverts who like younger girls.

{"commentId":9641825,"threadId":"682873","contentId":"3300354","authorDomain":"rachel-191090"}
  • 3 votes
#4 - Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:59 PM EDT
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"682873","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"682873","contentId":"3300354"}