Sorry Martin, but at least the demo (if your points are referring to it) is definitely an old build. So the graphics will indeed look better (question is how much) Simple as that.
If you are judging the game from videos you can't be taken seriously anyway.
last-sunset: Sorry Martin, but at least the demo (if your points are referring to it) is definitely an old build. So the graphics will indeed look better (question is how much) Simple as that.
If you are judging the game from videos you can't be taken seriously anyway.
Ok first thing im not judging the game from videos but from demo i played on PC and 360(dont know about ps3 i supose is the same as 360). Game is nowhere "close" to the Pc version.
Demo old build? Not at all. Its final code. Let me ask you something. Have you seen in demo text "work in progress" or "this demo does not represent quality of the final product"? No?
THis text is often in many demos where work(engine code) is still not finished.
Demo is using final code and will not look or run better. Deal with it mate
martin1841: minus jaggies minus smaller res. minus poor framerate minus tearing minus physics minus worst shadow quality
minus a wannabe Pc elitist On the ps3 (and most likely on the 360 as well), the demo wasn't the final built so I would save my judgments for the retail version.
I have pc, ps3 and 360 i am not Pc elitist. Full game will be out in ~2 weeks what we have seen was from final built. Game will not look/run better.
People understimate Consols both PS3 and 360 have better CPU and GPU then most games MAX requirements on a PC yes PC its 1000000 times better but most game requres a Pantium 4 at most easily surpas by ether consol CPU
Ram its where the difrence shows the most none the less other then frame rate and jaggys ther shud not be much difrence betwing PC and Consol Mainly because this game grafics are not really that advance i seen many games on PS3 and 360 that look better then this game
last-sunset: minus a wannabe Pc elitist On the ps3 (and most likely on the 360 as well), the demo wasn't the final built so I would save my judgments for the retail version.
I have pc, ps3 and 360 i am not Pc elitist. Full game will be out in ~2 weeks what we have seen was from final built. Game will not look/run better.
People understimate Consols both PS3 and 360 have better CPU and GPU then most games MAX requirements on a PC yes PC its 1000000 times better but most game requres a Pantium 4 at most easily surpas by ether consol CPU
Ram its where the difrence shows the most none the less other then frame rate and jaggys ther shud not be much difrence betwing PC and Consol Mainly because this game grafics are not really that advance i seen many games on PS3 and 360 that look better then this game
Requirements mean nothing, Gears of War on the PC require more than Crysis, yet it's undeniable that Crysis is both more demanding, and better looking.
The difference from the PC and console versions is the resolution, ambient occlusion, anti-aliasing, and anisotropic filtering. So the differences are major, it's undeniable, Marcos.
martin1941: Demo is using final code and will not look or run better. Deal with it mate
It was stated by different sites that the demo wasn't final code (and not an assumption like you made one), so I guess you are right..., but let's wait for retail.
Btw. I own a new gaming rig and all consoles do I don't have to deal with anything at all 'mate'
martin1841: I have pc, ps3 and 360 i am not Pc elitist. Full game will be out in ~2 weeks what we have seen was from final built. Game will not look/run better.
People understimate Consols both PS3 and 360 have better CPU and GPU then most games MAX requirements on a PC yes PC its 1000000 times better but most game requres a Pantium 4 at most easily surpas by ether consol CPU
Ram its where the difrence shows the most none the less other then frame rate and jaggys ther shud not be much difrence betwing PC and Consol Mainly because this game grafics are not really that advance i seen many games on PS3 and 360 that look better then this game
Requirements mean nothing, Gears of War on the PC require more than Crysis, yet it's undeniable that Crysis is both more demanding, and better looking.
The difference from the PC and console versions is the resolution, ambient occlusion, anti-aliasing, and anisotropic filtering. So the differences are major, it's undeniable, Marcos.
Actually distinction is better on pc i play physics on high on pc and when you shoot wooden barrel there were loads of little bits details and all and detailed destruction.
I shoot it on 360 there maybe 3 pieces little detail gone in less than few seconds.
martin1941: Demo is using final code and will not look or run better. Deal with it mate
It was stated by different sites that the demo wasn't final code (and not an assumption like you made one), so I guess you are right..., but let's wait for retail.
Btw. I own a new gaming rig and all consoles do I don't have to deal with anything at all 'mate'
Ok then lets wait for full game. You are living in fantasy world if you think that full game will perform better.
I can assure you that my 4 core CPU @ 4ghz is faster than so called CELL with 6 cores. Raw Ghz's is not the only thing that matters. Modern CPU has also lots of fast "cache" memory L2, L3 etc.
last-sunset: Sorry Martin, but at least the demo (if your points are referring to it) is definitely an old build. So the graphics will indeed look better (question is how much) Simple as that. If you are judging the game from videos you can't be taken seriously anyway.
So, the demo was created years before and they had the time to enchance the engine since ?
NightAntilli: Btw, I must say Mafia II looks very impressive.
I take this back. After downloading the demo, it was very clear to me that the game is sub-HD. That alone is not a problem, but it has jaggies that are worse than Halo 3 O.o And it's blurry.
martin1941: Demo is using final code and will not look or run better. Deal with it mate
It was stated by different sites that the demo wasn't final code (and not an assumption like you made one), so I guess you are right..., but let's wait for retail. Btw. I own a new gaming rig and all consoles do I don't have to deal with anything at all 'mate'
Ok then lets wait for full game. You are living in fantasy world if you think that full game will perform better. @marcos27pr I can assure you that my 4 core CPU @ 4ghz is faster than so called CELL with 6 cores. Raw Ghz's is not the only thing that matters. Modern CPU has also lots of fast "cache" memory L2, L3 etc.
The Red Dead Redemption and Halo Reach pics looks amazing. Whenever I play Red Dead I look around at the environments and it never ceases to amaze me how great it looks.
martin1841: I have pc, ps3 and 360 i am not Pc elitist. Full game will be out in ~2 weeks what we have seen was from final built. Game will not look/run better.
People understimate Consols both PS3 and 360 have better CPU and GPU then most games MAX requirements on a PC yes PC its 1000000 times better but most game requres a Pantium 4 at most easily surpas by ether consol CPU
Ram its where the difrence shows the most none the less other then frame rate and jaggys ther shud not be much difrence betwing PC and Consol Mainly because this game grafics are not really that advance i seen many games on PS3 and 360 that look better then this game
Requirements mean nothing, Gears of War on the PC require more than Crysis, yet it's undeniable that Crysis is both more demanding, and better looking.
The difference from the PC and console versions is the resolution, ambient occlusion, anti-aliasing, and anisotropic filtering. So the differences are major, it's undeniable, Marcos.
last-sunset: It was stated by different sites that the demo wasn't final code (and not an assumption like you made one), so I guess you are right..., but let's wait for retail. Btw. I own a new gaming rig and all consoles do I don't have to deal with anything at all 'mate'
Ok then lets wait for full game. You are living in fantasy world if you think that full game will perform better. @marcos27pr I can assure you that my 4 core CPU @ 4ghz is faster than so called CELL with 6 cores. Raw Ghz's is not the only thing that matters. Modern CPU has also lots of fast "cache" memory L2, L3 etc.
LOL fail... he's a 360 fanboy not a PS3 fanboy
I am not Ps3 or 360 fanboy I say what i think and can prove what i say I like Ps3 as much as i like Xbox but i dont agreed whit Uc2 / Kz2 and gow3 being the best on PS3 reason to why people think am a 360 fanboy because people think i have to worship Exclusives
as far as PC go's martin1841 YES a PC its 10000 times better then a consol but if i take a picture and uplode it to my pc and consol it will look the same in both
what i mean its ther is a difrence betwing what a PC can do and what games developers do you talk abut PC 4 core CPU @ 4ghz but fail to see that the best grafics on PC Crysis Max requirment its only Pantium 4 2.8ghz and both 360 and PS3 surpass that by a lot the only problem on consols its ram and not by much sure they can make better grafics on PC but not many game developers have the skill to surpass what we seen so far
Nice shots... if it wasn't for the game falling into the uncanny valley everytime they talk, it would be the nicest looking game this year IMO... Love those landscapes!