CAPE CANAVERAL — NASA's planet-hunting telescope, Kepler, rocketed into space Friday night on a historic voyage to track down other Earths in a faraway patch of the Milky Way galaxy.
It's the first mission capable of answering the age-old question: Are other worlds like ours out there?
Kepler, named after the German 17th century astrophysicist, set off on its unprecedented mission at 10:49 p.m., thundering into a clear sky embellished by a waxing moon.
"It was just magnificent. It looked like a star was being formed in the sky," said Bill Borucki, Kepler's principal scientist. "Everybody was delighted, everybody was screaming, 'Go Kepler!'"
Kepler's mission will last at least 3 1/2 years and cost $600 million.
The goal is to find, if they exist, Earth-like planets circling stars in the so-called habitable zone — orbits where liquid water could be present on the surface of the planets. That would mean there are lots of places out there for life to evolve, Borucki said.
On the other hand, "if we don't find any, it really means Earths are very rare, we might be the only extant life and, in fact, that will be the end of 'Star Trek.' "
Once it's settled into an Earth-trailing orbit around the sun, Kepler will stare nonstop at 100,000 stars near the Cygnus and Lyra constellations, between 600 and 3,000 light years away. The telescope will watch for any dimming, or winks, in the stellar brightness that might be caused by orbiting planets.
Astronomers already have found more than 300 planets orbiting other stars, but they're largely inhospitable gas giants like Jupiter. Kepler will be looking for smaller rocky planets akin to Earth.
Kepler is designed to find hundreds of Earth-like planets if they're common and, perhaps, dozens of them in the habitable zone, Borucki said. The telescope is so powerful that from space, NASA maintains, it could detect someone in a small town turning off a porch light at night.
It won't be looking for signs of life, though. That's for future spacecraft.
NASA was counting on a successful launch to offset the loss last week of the space agency's Orbiting Carbon Observatory. That environmental satellite ended up crashing into the Antarctic because of rocket failure. It was a different type of rocket than the one used for Kepler.
Everything seemed to go well with Kepler's launch.
___
On the Net:
NASA: http://www.nasa.gov/kepler
And best of all . . . what a cool namesake!
Cool!
It will stare at 100,000 stars for more than three years.
How wasted is that?
Not wasted at all. I appreciate NASA and their efforts.
Wasted in the sense that, Who stares into space for hours on end?
...one toke over the line
; )
Actually, you could ask my husband, I do religiously. I love the stars.
I don't think starring at space is a waste of time, that's how me make sure nothing is coming at us.
I'm not so sure it really matters if other earth like planets are out there, if they are out of our reach. I think we should just assume they are. I think we are better off concentrating on colonizing the planets we have, like Mars, rather than trying to prove the obvious.
I am inspired by our space exploration. Global warming, population growth, and wars over energy resources are reasons to look for other places to call home. I do not think we are the only life forms. How egocentric is that.
In my life time I have seen the first sputnik traverse the sky/ This was seen as a waste by some, but look at the great strides we have made in technology, medicine, education and thought.
I think this is an exciting time. We can not isolate. We need to search for the new spice route. It is amazing.
| |